Latest News

Rethinking retirement: how much is enough for a fuilfiling future?

.

Introduction: The Perennial Retirement Question

It is a simple question with an answer we probably don’t want to hear. In Australia—a country where superannuation is compulsory—most workers accept that saving for retirement is part of life. Yet, when it comes to the perennial question of “how much is enough?”, the conversation is shadowed by uncertainty, disengagement, and even apathy. Recent AMP research shows that two in three Australians under 40 believe they need more wealth to feel financially confident about retirement, while less than one in twelve feel secure and independent. As Morningstar observes, one downside of the compulsory aspect of super is the evidence that many Australians are disengaged from their own retirement outcomes.

The numbers, rules of thumb, and official standards can seem remote or arbitrary, with many Australians content to trust default super fund settings without deeper exploration of their actual retirement needs. The use of retirement needs calculators and modelling tools, now widely available from super funds and financial institutions, is helping address this by giving individuals a more personal estimate of what they will need and what they will have.

The Standards and Rules of Thumb: How Much Do Australians Really Need?

Australians looking for clarity often turn to guides such as the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Retirement Standard. This benchmark provides detailed budgets for “modest” and “comfortable” retirement lifestyles and has been widely adopted by advisers, Government, and industry.

A “comfortable” lifestyle, according to ASFA and AMP, typically allows for a good standard of living, social activities, health cover, and leisure, including the occasional international trip. Modest budgets cover basic living needs and a few extras, sitting above the Age Pension alone. For renters, “modest” is the primary reference, as the challenge of covering market rents results in significantly higher required savings.

Super Consumers Australia provides alternative lump sum targets, grounded in the actual spending data of current retirees. Their rule-of-thumb targets also distinguish between singles and couples, and between low, medium, and high spending groups. The Age Pension remains pivotal in almost every scenario, especially for low to medium spenders.

A common “rule of thumb” persists: most retirees should aim to replace about 70% of their pre-retirement income. Yet, as seen in these models, the actual lump sum needed is shaped by lifestyle goals, housing status, and access to the pension. A single “magic number” does not fit all.

What the Numbers Miss: Risks, Assumptions, and Human Factors

While helpful, these benchmarks are built on layers of assumption. The classic retirement model presumes steady career-long employment, uninterrupted super contributions, and investment returns that mirror long-term averages. The AMP article highlights how the age at which you retire, your health, partner’s plans, and debts all influence both your balance and your drawdown period. Longevity risk is real: retiring at 65 means planning for a retirement that may last 20-25 years.

In practice, individuals face career breaks, part-time years, market downturns, and periods out of the workforce for family duties. As both Morningstar and Super Consumers Australia caution, “no one number fits every situation—assumptions matter.” Policy improvements (like increasing the super guarantee to 12%) have helped mitigate risk, but they cannot eliminate it for everyone.

For those renting in retirement, research from ASFA, AMP, and others shows a substantially higher risk of financial insecurity. Housing costs remain a key determinant of wellbeing, with renters facing bigger savings requirements and greater risk of poverty.

Uncertainties also affect expenditure. As the Grattan Institute and AMP note, spending typically declines throughout retirement, though health and aged care costs can rise with age. Discounted amenities and pensioner benefits introduce more nuance.

The Real Drivers: Savings Rate, Asset Allocation, and Behaviour

More important than any benchmark is the power of individual behaviour and strategy. Morningstar’s projections show that compulsory super guarantee contributions invested in a balanced fund may only replace 50-63% of pre-retirement income—below many benchmarks. AMP’s calculators and case studies provide similar stories: the hypothetical “Mac”, aiming for a comfortable retirement, finds his projected savings fall short of anticipated needs by up to ten years—a wakeup call that many share.

Asset allocation is a critical factor—those who leave a higher proportion in growth-oriented investments over time gain considerable compounding benefits. Even a small increase in annual return (as demonstrated by shifting from balanced to high-growth options) can translate into tens of thousands of dollars more in retirement. Likewise, controlling fees, minimising unnecessary trading, and appropriately managing tax have a strong cumulative effect.

AMP’s Lifetime solutions—such as the Super Lifetime Boost—illustrate a practical response to the interplay of investment returns and social security eligibility. By structuring part of the pension within a Lifetime Pension product, clients can benefit from more favourable asset test treatment for Age Pension purposes, effectively boosting retirement income for longer.

Lack of confidence, inertia, and poor financial literacy are ongoing challenges, as shown by AMP’s research into Australians’ retirement readiness. Tools like calculators and simulators can help, but education and proactive advice are just as essential for making sound choices over time.

Beyond the Maths: Flexibility, Resilience, and Living Well

Planning for retirement is not just about arithmetic or chasing a “right number”; it is about building in resilience, flexibility, and life satisfaction. Saving and investing not only protect against the known risks but offer a payoff if circumstances are favourable—anything saved above the minimum can provide freedom, comfort, or extra options later in life.

Successful retirees adapt as conditions change—spending more in early retirement, reducing needs later, exploring gradual work transitions, or leveraging Government age pension when appropriate. AMP’s modelling highlights the benefits of acting early: making even small changes (reviewing investment mix, increasing contributions, or using salary sacrifice) sooner can dramatically affect outcomes. Practical strategies include:

• Saving above the guaranteed minimum, especially when young or able.
• Adjusting investments as your risk tolerance or circumstances change.
• Incorporating potential inheritance, sale of property, or downsizing into plans.
• Exploring innovative products (such as AMP’s Lifetime solutions) to extend or stabilise retirement income.
• Factoring in health, family needs, and likely spending patterns on leisure and essentials.

A fulfilling retirement isn’t just about hitting a number— it’s about maintaining options, independence, and the ability to respond to life’s surprises with security and dignity.

Conclusion

Rethinking retirement means moving beyond the “magic number” toward a practical, adaptable, and personal approach. Use industry benchmarks as a guide, but never as the sole determinant. By starting early, seeking advice, using available calculators and tools, and acting on knowledge throughout one’s career, Australians give themselves the best chance not just to survive—but to thrive and enjoy life in retirement, whatever it may bring.