Page 6 - Wealth-Adviser-Issue-118 (FWP)
P. 6

ISSUE 118
                                                                                                           AUGUST 2025



                         Australia’s digital identity proposals, aiming to link digital
                    wallets with verified identity systems, further blur lines between

                         convenience and surveillance. Citizens must weigh faster
                          payments against potential loss of transactional privacy.




        ledger can expose transaction histories in granular detail.   guardrails aim to balance innovation with financial system
        Policy proposals in the United States have ignited debate   stability and consumer protection.
        over mandatory data collection. As the Cato Institute warns,
        “Stablecoin legislation must ensure financial privacy, or risk   Financial-Infrastructure Resilience
        a surveillance infrastructure rivalled only by centralised   4and Innovation
        digital currencies” .                                     Traditional networks’ resilience stems from their net-
                        5
           Similarly, concerns have been raised that U.S. regulatory   work effects—each additional user increases value for all
        drafts would require transaction reporting far beyond exist-  participants. Stablecoins must replicate these features to
        ing banking requirements: “Concerns raised over privacy in   compete meaningfully. Collateral requirements, reserve
        U.S. stablecoin legislation highlight the risk of blanket data   audits and governance frameworks underpin trust in
        collection on consumer behaviour” .                     fiat-backed tokens. As Magellan notes, the Genius Act’s
                                       6
           These issues echo debates over central bank digital   AML/KYC mandates are a “step in the right direction for
        currencies (CBDCs). Unlike private stablecoins, CBDCs give   stablecoins to be considered as an ‘alternative payment’
        central banks ultimate control: “Bitcoin vs. CBDCs: The   mechanism” .
                                                                           1
        difference is control—CBDCs enable government oversight   Collaboration between fintechs, stablecoin issuers and
        over every transaction, while private cryptos preserve more   incumbents offers a path to incremental innovation. For
        user autonomy” .                                        instance, Taurus’s open-source privacy layer for USDC could
                      7
           Australia’s digital identity proposals, aiming to link digital   allow users to shield transaction details selectively, combin-
        wallets with verified identity systems, further blur lines   ing blockchain transparency with enhanced privacy . Major
                                                                                                            10
        between convenience and surveillance. Citizens must weigh   banks in Australia are exploring partnerships with token
        faster payments against potential loss of transactional privacy.  issuers to streamline cross-border settlement, drawing on
                                                                both regulated expertise and blockchain efficiency.
           Incumbent Competition
        3and Regulatory Dynamics                                   Navigating the Trade-Offs: Practical Guidance
           Stablecoins have been hyped as disruptors to Visa and  5for Consumers
        Mastercard networks. However, the established card rails   Australian consumers curious about stablecoins should
        benefit from decades of investment, scale and regulatory   adopt a cautious, informed approach:
        integration. Magellan’s analysis cautions: “Much of the
        excitement around stablecoin being the next big disruptor   Evaluate Provider Transparency: Choose issuers with reg-
        in consumer payments is misplaced…they lack the seamless,   ular reserve attestation, clear governance and robust AML/
        secure global network and consumer protections of V/MA” .  KYC practices .
                                                                           1
                                                           1
           Visa processes roughly 65,000 transactions per second
        across 200+ countries with built-in fraud protections and   Use Privacy-Enhancing Tools: Opt for wallets or layer-two
        chargeback rights—features that stablecoins cannot yet   solutions that support selective disclosure and advanced
        rival . Regulators in Australia and the EU have acted to cap   privacy features .
                                                                              10
            1
        interchange fees, preserving consumer outcomes while
        ensuring network viability .                            Limit Exposure in Day-to-Day Spending: Reserve stable-
                               1
           Government policy will shape stablecoin trajectories.   coins chiefly for cross-border transfers or niche use cases;
        Australia’s Treasury is modernising payment regulation to   continue using regulated card and bank networks for every-
        include licensing frameworks for digital payments pro-  day purchases to retain consumer protections.
        viders, including stablecoin issuers . The Reserve Bank’s
                                       8
        2022 Bulletin called for clear guidelines on reserve backing,   Stay Informed on Regulation: Monitor developments from
        operational resilience and AML/KYC compliance . These   the RBA and Treasury regarding licensing, consumer
                                                  9
                                                                                                                   6
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11