Page 8 - Wealth-Adviser-Issue-124 (FWP)
P. 8

ISSUE 124
                                                                                                        NOVEMBER 2025

        distribution that once would have flowed tax-free within the   favour of trusts—as one quoted adviser indicates, “I closed
        group.                                                  our SMSF and now use a trust”—these issues loom especially
           Similarly, beneficiaries and trustees face new uncertainty   large. While audit fees and minimum pension rules may
        around the 45-day holding rule, particularly when corporate   disappear, sound estate planning advice becomes even more
        beneficiaries are created after a dividend is paid. Without   essential. The right trust can achieve secure, efficient wealth
        clear guidance, trustees risk the ATO denying franking credit   transfer, but missteps can leave loved ones adrift or asset
        eligibility on technical grounds. Section 100A reimburse-  control subject to fierce contention.
        ment agreements also represent a live threat: these rules
        focus on whether beneficiaries “receive the ultimate bene-  Asset Protection, SMSF Alternatives, and
        fit” from trust entitlements, with audits continuing despite   Practical Scenarios
        ongoing litigation and mixed outcomes in the courts.      One of the family trust’s unique strengths lies in its asset
           Commentators from KPG Taxation frame these develop-  protection strategies. Compared to partnerships or even
        ments as a sign that “ongoing vigilance” is now essential,   SMSFs, trusts offer greater flexibility and security. “Running
        as policies dating back to the Jon Ralph Review over twenty   a small business through a partnership is inflexible with
        years ago are again on the table. Proposed reforms include   no asset protection for a start. A trust is better,” as noted
        everything from a flat trust tax rate (possibly 24–30%),   by advisers with decades of experience. For older couples,
        treating trusts as companies for tax purposes, reducing the   moving investment assets into a trust provides practical
        capital gains discount, or implementing dual rates where   control and reduced legal exposure, especially as family
        passive income is taxed differently to labour. Such changes,   circumstances evolve.
        while not yet law, would fundamentally reshape the advan-  KPG Taxation and Accounting Times both highlight
        tages family trusts offer and require retail clients to review   scenarios in which trusts provide more robust structuring
        their strategies in anticipation.                       than direct ownership or SMSFs. Discretionary trusts allow
                                                                stewards to manage distributions to beneficiaries optimal-
        Succession Planning and Estate Security                 ly—sometimes for tax reasons, sometimes to safeguard
           Beyond tax, the family trust’s value as an instrument for   assets from creditors, family law complications, or business
        succession and estate planning remains one of its strongest   volatility. Additionally, companies can be incorporated as
        attributes. Unlike direct property ownership or even SMSFs,   corporate beneficiaries to harness retained earnings and
        discretionary trusts can be tailored to bypass delays like   accumulate franking credits, though recent commentary
        probate and facilitate smooth intergenerational wealth   cautions that new regulatory interpretations threaten some
        transfer. “Trust income can be redirected swiftly and simply   of these advantages.
        upon the death of the primary beneficiary,” writes one    Nevertheless, trusts are not a panacea for tax minimisa-
        experienced accountant, “ensuring continuity of income to a   tion. As FirstLinks puts it plainly, “tax benefits arising from
        spouse and setting the stage for further transitions suited to   use of trusts are limited in the overall context and have so
        the family’s unique needs.”                             for a very long time. They are useful for legal structuring
           Quotes from FirstLinks highlight the elegance of trusts in   and can be helpful in asset protection.” In fact, some
        avoiding the “delays of probate (or, worse, a contested will)”   practitioners argue for greater enforcement of existing law
        and enabling options such as spendthrift trusts for children   rather than more complexity, especially as issues like unpaid
        or charitable donations. Importantly, such arrangements   distributions, Division 7A loans, and reimbursement agree-
        can be crafted to maintain control in unpredictable family,   ments are subject to fresh litigation and possible legislative
        market, or legal environments, always at the discretion of   overhaul.
        the appointed trustee—a role commonly filled by a company   Alternate structures, such as investment companies with
        whose directors evolve alongside the family’s needs.    tailored share classes, are increasingly used to replicate
           Yet this flexibility comes with risk, especially if trust   or even outdo some trust advantages. But for most retail
        elections and succession plans are not carefully stewarded.   clients, the discretionary family trust remains an attractive
        Cases where FTDT is triggered during generational change,   baseline, so long as they are prepared to manage its compli-
        or where the test individual’s passing throws planned   ance obligations and adapt to evolving taxation rules.
        distributions into disarray, demonstrate the hazards of poor
        administration. Accounting Times argues that “succession   Philosophical and Policy Debates: The Future of
        must be embedded into the very design of the trust,” not   the Family Trust
        bolted on as an afterthought, lest beneficiaries find them-  The family trust has always been at the centre of wider
        selves exposed to sudden tax burdens or legal disputes.  philosophical debates around fairness, generational equity,
           For families contemplating the winding up of SMSFs in   and the burden borne by different taxpayers. Contention

                                                                                                                   8
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10