Page 11 - Wealth-Adviser-Issue-137 (FWP)
P. 11

ISSUE 137
                                                                                                             MAY 2026



               Contributing to super while drawing a pension from it is a separate question and one
              that catches some people out. There is no rule against it — a person can run an account-
               based pension from one part of their super while making contributions into another —
                but the contributions are made into accumulation phase, not into the pension itself.



        in that age band who wanted to make a voluntary super   the cap. The strategy is one of the more valuable planning
        contribution had to satisfy the work test — they had to have   levers in this age band for those who qualify.
        worked at least 40 hours within 30 consecutive days in the   Contributing to super while drawing a pension from it
        financial year. After 1 July 2022, the work test was removed   is a separate question and one that catches some people
        for non-concessional contributions and salary sacrifice   out. There is no rule against it — a person can run an ac-
        contributions. It still applies, however, for personal de-  count-based pension from one part of their super while
        ductible contributions — that is, after-tax contributions the   making contributions into another — but the contributions
        individual then claims a tax deduction for. The 40-hours-in-  are made into accumulation phase, not into the pension
        30-consecutive-days test must be met in the income year in   itself. This means the contributed funds aren’t part of the
        which the contribution is made.                         pension drawdown amount and aren’t subject to the transfer
           The practical effect is a useful flexibility for people in   balance cap until or unless they’re later commuted into
        their late 60s and early 70s who are no longer working but   pension phase. For working pensioners receiving SG, this is
        who have surplus cash to top up super. They can make    mechanically how the SG enters their super while they’re
        non-concessional contributions (up to $120,000 a year, or   also drawing down on the pre-existing pension.
        up to $360,000 over three years using the bring-forward   A brief cross-reference: the contribution caps, the car-
        rule, subject to their total super balance being below the   ry-forward rule, the downsizer contribution (now available
        relevant threshold) without working at all. They cannot,   from age 55), and the Division 296 tax (which applies from
        however, claim a deduction for a personal contribution   1 July 2026 to balances over $3 million) were all covered in
        without meeting the work test.                          detail in Issues 131, 132, and 134.
           The Superannuation Guarantee position is now also
        straightforward. The age limit on SG was abolished in 2013,   Strategic considerations to bring to the adviser
        so employers must pay SG for eligible workers of any age.   The mechanics above describe the rules. The strategic
        The SG rate reached its final legislated rate of 12 per cent   questions that emerge from them are personal — they
        on 1 July 2025 and remains there permanently — there are   depend on assets, expected work duration, bequest pref-
        no further scheduled increases. From 1 July 2026, payday   erences, and the specific timing of major life events. The
        super applies, meaning employers must remit SG at the   article cannot answer those questions for any individual
        same time as each pay run rather than quarterly, which is   reader, and shouldn’t try. What it can do is name the ques-
        covered in detail in Issues 132 and 134. For an older worker,   tions worth raising.
        the practical implication is that SG continues to accumulate   The first is the timing of any Age Pension claim. For
        in their super balance as long as they remain employed,   someone working past 67, the temptation can be to delay
        which can be a useful tax-effective channel for additional   claiming the pension until employment income drops, on
        savings even where retirement income is already drawn   the assumption that the pension and the income test will
        from a separate pension account.                        eat each other. That intuition is often partly wrong. Claiming
           Carry-forward concessional contributions are particularly   the pension at 67 — even where the payment is initially quite
        relevant for many older workers. Someone who has been   small — starts the work bonus clock running, which builds
        under the annual concessional cap in earlier years — usually   up the income bank for use in future years when employ-
        because they were on a lower income, on parental leave, or   ment may be more sporadic. Even a modest pension entitle-
        contributing modestly — can accumulate up to five years of   ment can provide access to supplement payments and the
        unused cap to use in a later year, provided their total super   Pensioner Concession Card, with its attached concessions
        balance is below $500,000 on 30 June of the preceding year.   on PBS prescriptions, council rates, public transport, and
        For a worker in their late 60s or early 70s who has come into   other state-based benefits. For most people working past
        a windfall, sold a business, or simply has surplus cash from   67, claiming early is the more useful default, but the right
        an inheritance or asset sale, carry-forward can support a   answer depends on the specific income and asset position.
        large concessional contribution that would otherwise breach   The second question is the choice between drawing more

                                                                                                                   11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13